Wednesday, October 6, 2010

The Broken Egg

    Designing a contraption to save Shelldon (the name of my team's egg) from breakage as a team was quite the experience.  Step 1 of the planning process went smoothly enough, as we had a clear idea of what needed to be done before the deadline.  When it came to step 2, our team was able to identify the resources that were to be given, but we didn't identify the strengths and weakness of our group.  I think at that point, everyone was individually trying to come up with an idea about how to make something that will allow the egg to land in peace.  After some thought, we moved on to step 3, where we shared our ideas, although not everyone had one.  However, that may have been better because we were able to decide on one design and possibly another as a backup.  For those group members that did not have their own idea, thinking about how to improve someone elses design would have been a good way to contribute.  As the time allocated toward planning was winding down, we should have actually implemented step 4.  We didn't assign roles throughout the team, so we ended up having to wing it when we actually started on step 5, where we actually began to build it.  I think that after this project, we have learned that it would have saved a lot of time if everyone knew exactly what they had to do.  When we actually began step 5 of implementing our plan and building the design, we ran into many problems.  The most glaring one was where the person who thought up of the design was the one actually building it.  While we all did help, such as giving him tape, and helping him with the materials use, he was the primary builder.  If we were able to figure how to divide it into parts and then putting it all together, we would have used our time much more efficiently.  At the end, with about a minute left, we had to rush to just tape whatever straws we had left on the bottom for cushion, since we were not able to complete the contraption.  Shelldon eventually went on to have his shell broken, but that's okay.  I feel that the team's ultimate performance came up short because we actually decided to modify the design from the one in the planning process.  We could have been more effective as a group in the planning of the task by making sure that we can build the entire thing in the specified time, and trying to work out a way to break up the design into more than 1 part so more people could work on it at once.

6 comments:

  1. Hi,its nice to read a review of someone from the same group.
    I don't agree with you it was good we didn't have many ideas because I truely believe that if we had more sketches to pick from we could build something more efficient.
    Regarding the implication,I agree that everyone tried to help as much as they could but it wasn't organized.At least we did everything with respect and had great communication between us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i believe with such a small thing to work around with, it's hard for more than 1 person to actually put the whole thing together. for my team, it was kind of only 1 person building it too, and the others just facilitating. other members were just passing tape or helping to hold up the straws to put the tape around it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, it is very good review your group processed, and your group had little bit rush of began step 5 of implementing. But not just your group of rush in the end, another too. That is why, not group to win this activity because we only has 10 minute to implement.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My group had the same problem, we never assigned a team leader or member roles. When it came time to build our contraption we just started taping straws together and it didn’t come out like we planned. We were in such a rush that I remember just sticking a straw somewhere in between two others without using tape during the last minute =)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey,

    Thanks for bringing up a very fine point: the designer was the one working on the task while everyone sat there with nothing to do. A better job could have been done making sure that more work was delegated to everyone so that there was an equal contribution and people feel engaged.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was similar in our group. There was a main focus on ideas before a proper assessment of the team member’s strengths and weakness. When we were under pressure we jumped to the task that seemed the most pressing. Yet, if had stopped and found out our strengths maybe it would have better informed our design.

    ReplyDelete